Summary:
S&P Upgraded Israel's Credit Rating to A+ (September 9, 2011)The rating action reflects S&P view of Israel's improved economic policy flexibility as a result of strong growth and careful macroeconomic management
Description: http://www.financeisrael.mof.gov.il/FinanceIsrael/Images/news/20110911_1.jpgStandard & Poor's Ratings Services (S&P) raised its long-term foreign currency sovereign credit ratings on the State of Israel to 'A+/A-1' from 'A/A-1'. At the same time, S&P affirmed the local currency ratings at 'AA-/A-1+'. Also, S&P's outlook is stable, and the transfer and convertibility (T&C) assessment remains at 'AA'.
S&P mentioned that their ratings on Israel are supported by their view of its "prosperous and resilient economy, strong institutions, ongoing fiscal consolidation, and robust external performance." The ratings are also constrained by significant geopolitical risks, partially offset by U.S. support, and its still-sizeable public-sector debt burden.
According to S&P, Israel is on a credible path toward continued government debt burden reduction and stronger external indicators, having weathered the global financial crisis well. S&P also noted that Israel's external position is sound, as a result of consistent current account surpluses since 2003, and that that the production of natural gas by the middle of the decade is likely to further increase the economy's efficiency as well as strengthen its fiscal and external positions.
The stable outlook reflects S&P's opinion that Israel's popular consensus about containing public debt will remain intact despite social protests. S&P noted that "despite rapid appreciation in housing prices, we do not consider the sovereign to be exposed to significant contingent liabilities from the financial system.
Also, according to S&P, the banking sector appears to be tightly regulated, resident banks seem to pursue relatively conservative business models, and Israeli banks and households are also fairly well capitalized by international standards.
S&P first upgraded Israel's credit rating to 'A' in 2007. In January 2009, it reaffirmed its decision, further giving Israel's market a "solid" forecast. Alongside the decision by S&P to upgrade Israel's credit rating to A+ this September, the two other major credit rating firms, Moody's and Fitch, also reaffirmed their rating towards Israel, as Moody's left Israel's A1-Stable rating unchanged, and Fitch ratings left Israel's A Stable rating unchanged.
Minister of Finance, Dr. Yuval Steinitz, noted that "this is an impressive credit given to the Israeli economy and its successful coping with the global economic crisis. This achievement of credit upgrade is especially unique given the debt and massive unemployment crisis, which hurt many economies' credit rating." Minister Steinitz also noted that "the fact that S&P mentioned the latest natural gas findings as a point of strength for the Israeli economy indicated the importance of the work done by the Committee to Examine the Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Resources in Israel, Headed by Prof. Eytan Sheshinski." The minister added that "Israel cannot rest on its laurels, as the on-going global crisis demands us to keep our budget frameworks and economic policies.
The Accountant General in the Ministry of Finance, Ms. Michal Abadi-Boiangiu, noted that "the announcement by S&P in such times, when the world is confronting a deep global economic crisis, testifies on the strength of the Israeli economy and reinforces the importance of reducing Israel's public debt.
SOURCE: http://www.financeisrael.mof.gov.il/FinanceIsrael/Pages/En/News/20110911.aspx
On August 8, 2011, Standard & Poor’s reiterated its A/A-1 sovereign credit rating for Israel with an outlook of “stable.”
Earlier this year, Moody’s and Fitch also reconfirmed ratings of “stable,” with Moody’s citing Israel’s “resilient and dynamic economy.”
In other positive economic news, Israel’s first quarter GDP growth reached 4.6 percent, prompting observers to upwardly revise their annual expectations. In addition, private consumption and gross fixed investment both increased in the first quarter of 2011, by 9.0 percent and 26.1 percent respectively. Israel’s Finance Ministry noted that “these numbers reflect the growing levels of optimism and consumer confidence in Israel’s economy.”
SALES GOALS EXCEEDED IN US, CANADA & INTERNATIONALLY NEW YORK, JANUARY 11, 2010:
The Development Corporation for Israel(DCI)/State of Israel Bonds announced that in 2009, worldwide sales of Israel bonds reached $1.2 billion, exceeding by $200 million the goal set by Israel’s Finance Ministry.
This includes sales of Israel bonds by DCI in the United States; Canada-Israel Securities, Ltd. in Canada; and Israel Bonds International (IBI) in the rest of the world.
In making the announcement, Bonds President & CEO Joshua Matza stated, “The accomplishments of 2009 were truly amazing. To exceed $1 billion in this difficult economic climate was a remarkable feat.”
He noted the strong sales were achieved despite lingering recession and ongoing uncertainty in the financial marketplace. He added: “Meeting the goal was the minimum Israel Bonds could do. The additional $200 million underscores the dependability of Israel Bonds and the commitment of Bonds leadership and staff. We owed to the Israeli people to go over and above expectations .”
U.S. sales were more than 10 percent above the domestic goal, and sales goals were also surpassed in Canada, Europe and Latin America. DCI/Israel Bonds Chairman of the Board Michael Siegal said the sales underscore “widespread recognition that Israel bonds represent an investment opportunity – no one has ever lost money investing in Israel bonds.”
National Chairman David Halpern emphasized, “The organization’s proven reliability is a major reason international ratings agencies frequently cite Israel Bonds as a factor when assigning Israel investment-grade ratings.”
The 2009 results bring total worldwide sales since the establishment of Israel Bonds in 1951 to more than $31 billion.
Development Corporation for Israel/State of Israel Bonds, which has consistently been praised by international ratings agencies Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch, as well as the IMF, offers securities issued by the government of Israel in the United States. Capital realized from the sale of bonds has been utilized to develop every facet of Israel’s economy. Israel has never defaulted and maintains a perfect record on payment of principal and interest on the securities it has issued.
Israel's economy is "ready to roar", according to Barclays Capital analysts Daniel Hewitt, Koon Chow, and Arko Sen. Finding that Israel passed through the global recession with only light damage, the analysts say the economy is ready to resume growing.
The analysts see three main reasons why Israel made it through the recession better than other economies. Israel's financial sector was not as vulnerable, "radical" monetary loosening by the Bank of Israel limited a decline in domestic demand, and that decline was also offset by improvements in net exports.
Barclays expects Israel's real GDP to grow 2.9 percent in 2010 and by 3.1 percent in 2011, with gross public debt falling to 76 percent of GDP in 2010, and 74.3 percent of GDP in 2011.
Barclays predicts that the shekel-dollar rate will fall to NIS 3.50/$ by the end of 2010, and will fall even further to NIS 3.40/$ by the end of 2011.
Barclays seems impressed with the Bank of Israel's handling of monetary policy during the recession. "Monetary policy was put on emergency loosening rates lowered to 0.5 percent and M1 money growth exceeding 60 percent. While this is similar to monetary policies in the G-3 countries among others, there are large differences. Inflation never dropped as much in Israel and growth declines were mild. Israel has had negative real interest rates since 2008. Thus, Israeli monetary policy has been pre-emptive rather than reactive. It is possible, even likely in our opinion, that if the Bank of Israel had not loosened monetary policy this much, the recession in Israel would have been deeper and could have experienced deflation (perhaps like Chile, Czech, Cyprus, and Malaysia). The Bank of Israel seems to have succeeded in counter-cyclical monetary policy."
The analysts note that Israel's fiscal policy played a smaller role in combating the effects of the recession, with what the analysts call a modest spending stimulus. However, the analysts do note Israel's falling government debt, and say that the current government is committed to responsible public finances and lowering public debt. "The public debt level is currently 77 percent of GDP, down from over 100 percent several years ago and Israel has benefited from an improved expenditure structure (for instance, military spending has decreased as a share of GDP). This cut in spending provides more room for private sector expansion. Still, spending pressures do exist, and there is some risk that expenditures will increase to take up the slack created by rising tax revenues."
The analysts warn that as a consequence of the "radical monetary policy" there is a higher inflation risk, but that the Bank of Israel appears committed to a process of gradual interest rate hikes which it says will bring rates to 3 percent by the end of 2010. They note that the shekel's appreciation should help to lower inflation.
Fitch: Israel is one of only four A-rated countries that will emerge from the recession in 2009.
Fitch Ratings are reiterated Israel's sovereign debt rating at A, with a "Stable" outlook. The rating is for Israel's long-term foreign currency issuer default rating. Israel's domestic bond rating was maintained at A+, also with a "Stable" outlook. Fitch follows Moody's Investors Service and S&P, both of which recently reiterated their credit ratings for Israel.
Fitch said that Israel is one of only four A-rated countries that will emerge from the recession in 2009. It said that the Israeli economy survived the global economic crisis in better shape than many similar economies. Israel's recession was easier than in similar European and Asian countries, and it was most felt in lower tax revenues.
Fitch partly attributed Israel's good performance to the Bank of Israel's aggressive monetary policy, including its exchange rate policy and increasing its foreign currency reserves. Additional factors were a stable, problem-free banking system, and the lack of bubbles in the domestic market. Israel's high-tech and services industries demonstrated stability in the face of falling global demand caused by the economic crisis, and those industries' exports led to an unprecedented current accounts surplus in 2009.
Fitch warned that Israel's high debt-to-GDP ratio was still the main factor limiting the country's sovereign rating, but said that fiscal anchors, such as the spending cap and deficit target, had slashed the ratio from 100% at the end of 2003 to 78% at the end of 2008. While still high, there are countries with a higher debt-to-GDP ratio.
By Dan Senor and Sol Singer
Israel has thrived during the global collapse—thanks to an entrepreneurial culture built on compulsory military service. Dan Senor and Saul Singer on why U.S. companies should take notes.
For all the press coverage of the Middle East, there is one side of Israel that gets scant attention: the country’s economy has the highest concentration of innovation and entrepreneurialism in the world today. For years, multinational technology companies and global investors have been beating a path to Israel. Even in 2008—a year of global economic turmoil—per capita venture investments in Israel were 2.5 times greater than in the United States, more than 30 times greater than in Europe, 80 times greater than in China, and 350 times greater than in India. And Israel still boasts the highest density of start-ups in the world (a total of 3,850 start-ups, one for every 1,844 Israelis). More Israeli companies are on NASDAQ than companies from all of Europe, China, India, Korea, and Japan combined.
The root of Israel’s economic dynamism—and the way it weathered a global downturn—can be traced to government policies that cultivate a unique entrepreneurialism. These include innovative immigration policies and disproportionate research and development spending (Israel is the world leader in the percentage of the economy that is spent on R&D). But the real turbocharger has been its universal military training and national service program.
Here's how it works. While students in other countries are preoccupied with deciding which college to attend, Israelis are weighing the merits of different military units. And just as students elsewhere are thinking about what they need to do to get into the best schools, many Israelis are positioning themselves to be recruited by the elite units of the IDF (Israel Defense Forces).
One IDF Army officer with whom we spoke knew when he was just twelve years old that he wanted to learn Arabic, partly because he realized even then that it might help him get accepted into the best intelligence units.
One year before reaching draft age, all seventeen-year-old males and females are called to report to IDF recruiting centers for an initial one-day screening that includes aptitude and psychological exams, interviews, and a medical evaluation. At the end of the day, a health and psychometric classification is determined and service possibilities are presented to the young candidate in a personal interview.
Those who complete the training together remain as a team throughout their regular and reserve service. Their unit becomes a second family. They remain in the reserves until they are in their mid-forties.
While it’s difficult to get into the top Israeli universities, the nation’s equivalent of Harvard, Princeton, and Yale are the IDF’s elite units. The unit in which an applicant served tells prospective employers what kind of selection process he or she navigated, and what skills and relevant experience he or she may already possess.
“In Israel, one’s academic past is somehow less important than the military past. One of the questions asked in every job interview is, Where did you serve in the army?” says Gil Kerbs, an intelligence unit alumnus who today works in Israel’s venture capital industry, specializing in China’s technology market. The advantage that Israel’s economy and its society gains from this equally dispersed national service experience was driven home to us by neither an Israeli nor an American—but rather by Gary Shainberg, an eighteen-year veteran of the British navy. Today, he is vice president for technology and innovation at British Telecom.
“There is something about the DNA of Israeli innovation that is unexplainable,” Shainberg said. But he did have the beginnings of a theory.
“I think it comes down to maturity. That’s because nowhere else in the world where people work in a center of technology innovation do they also have to do national service.”
At the age of 18, Israelis go into the army for a minimum of two to three years. If they don’t reenlist, they typically enroll at a university.
“There’s a massive percentage of Israelis who go to university out of the army compared to anywhere else in the world,” said Shainberg.
In fact, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 45 percent of Israelis are university-educated, which is among the highest percentages in the world. And according to a recent IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, Israel was ranked second among sixty developed nations on the criterion of whether “university education meets the needs of a competitive economy.”
By the time students finish college, they’re in their mid-twenties; some already have graduate degrees, and a large number are married. “All this changes the mental ability of the individual,” Shainberg reasoned. “They’re much more mature; they’ve got more life experience. Innovation is all about finding ideas.”
Innovation often depends on having a different perspective. Perspective comes from experience. Real experience also typically comes with age or maturity. But in Israel, you get experience, perspective, and maturity at a younger age, because the society jams so many transformative experiences into Israelis when they’re barely out of high school. By the time they get to college, their heads are in a different place than those of their American counterparts.
“You’ve got a whole different perspective on life. I think it’s that later education, the younger marriage, the military experience—and I spent eighteen years in the [British] navy, so I can sort of empathize with that sort of thing,” Shainberg went on. “In the military, you’re in an environment where you have to think on your feet. You have to make life-and-death decisions. You learn about discipline. You learn about training your mind to do things, especially if you’re frontline or you’re doing something operational. And that can only be good and useful in the business world.”
This maturity is especially powerful when mixed with an almost childish impatience.
Since their country’s founding, Israelis have been keenly aware that the future—both near and distant—is always in question. Every moment has strategic importance. As Mark Gerson, an American entrepreneur who has invested in several Israeli start-ups, described it, “When an Israeli man wants to date a woman, he asks her out that night. When an Israeli entrepreneur has a business idea, he will start it that week. The notion that one should accumulate credentials before launching a venture simply does not exist. This is actually good in business. Too much time can only teach you what can go wrong, not what could be transformative.”
The IDF also offers recruits another valuable experience: a unique space within Israeli society where young men and women work closely and intensely with peers from different cultural, socioeconomic, and religious backgrounds. A young Jew from Russia, another from Ethiopia, a secular sabra (native-born Israeli) from a swanky Tel Aviv suburb, a yeshiva student from Jerusalem, and a kibbutznik from a farming family might all meet in the same unit. They’ll spend two to three years serving together full-time, and then spend another twenty-plus years of annual service in the reserves.
The IDF was structured to rely heavily on reserve forces, since there is no way for such a small country to maintain a sufficiently large standing army. So for combat soldiers, connections made in the army are constantly renewed through decades of reserve duty. For a few weeks a year, or sometimes just a week at a time, Israelis depart from their professional and personal lives to train with their military unit. Not surprisingly, many business connections are made during the long hours of operations, guard duty, and training.
While a majority of Israeli entrepreneurs were profoundly influenced by their stint in the IDF, a military background is hardly common in Silicon Valley or widespread in the senior echelons of corporate America.
As Israeli entrepreneur Jon Medved—who has sold several start-ups to large American companies—told us, “When it comes to U.S. military résumés, Silicon Valley is illiterate. It’s a shame. What a waste of the kick-ass leadership talent coming out of Iraq and Afghanistan. The American business world doesn’t quite know what to do with them.”
In Israel it is the opposite. While Israeli businesses still look for private-sector experience, military service provides the critical standardized metric for employers—all of whom know what it means to be an officer or to have served in an elite unit.
Dan Senor, a professional investor, is an adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and author of Start-up Nation: The Story of Israel's Economic Miracle. From 2003-2004, he was based in Baghdad as a senior adviser to the U.S.-led Coalition in Iraq.
Saul Singer is a columnist for the Jerusalem Post, where he also served for six years as editorial page editor.
Moody's reaffirmed Israel's A1 rating after their annual trip to Israel this past June, 2009.
In addition, Standard & Poor's also re-affirmed their A rating for Israel following their visit this past July, 2009.
Fitch also made their annual visit this past July and should release their rating update soon.
Israel's rating reaffirmation in the midst of a global financial crisis where many countries are being downgraded shows the strength and stability of the Israeli economy.
(Source: Ministry of Finance – Debt Management Unit, Accountant General).
International credit ratings firm Moody's upgraded Israel's foreign and local currency bond ratings and foreign currency ceiling for bank deposits to A1 from A2.
The upgrade reflects Israel's proven resiliency in the face of repeated economic and political shocks and the ongoing financial and political support from the United States and the Jewish Diaspora, said Moody's.
Finance Minister Ronnie Bar-On said in response that "particularly in these times of instability and an international credit crisis, Israel's economy is being recognized for its fortitude and stability."
"Fiscal reforms are paying off in terms of increased economic vibrancy, diversification and competitiveness, and to the benefit of strengthening tax revenues, in spite of tax cuts. These factors have led Israel to post consistent current account surpluses, helping to insulate the economy in the current adverse global conditions," said Joan Feldbaum-Vidra, an analyst at Moody's.
About 70% of the government's external debt is sourced from US loan guarantees or State of Israel Bonds at favorable costs of funding.
State of Israel Bonds are sold mainly to Jewish communities outside of Israel, a group with deep and ready pockets to finance the Jewish state, especially during times of domestic or regional conflict. ‘These ample sources of liquidity are key credit strengths underlying Israel's high credit rating,’ said Lindow.”
18/03/2008
Moody's has placed Israel's A2 government bond ratings and the A2 country ceiling for foreign currency bank deposits on review for possible upgrade. The ratings have carried a positive outlook since May 2006. All other sovereign ratings are affirmed, including the Aa1 country ceiling for foreign currency debt.
The review for upgrade reflects both the resilience of the Israeli economy in response to repeated economic and political shocks and the fiscal consolidation of the past several years. Underlying the country's rating is a history of financial and political support from the United States and the Jewish diaspora.
Moody's review will primarily focus on the continued ability of the government to stay the course on debt reduction notwithstanding a fractious domestic and regional political environment and the ever-more challenging global credit climate.
"Its ability to absorb economic and political shocks without fundamentally subverting its prudent fiscal strategy nor undermining its economic vibrancy distinguishes Israel favorably relative to an emerging market," according to Kristin Lindow, Moody's lead sovereign analyst for Israel.
Lindow observed that Israel's high per capita income, its competitive high-tech and industrial sectors, and strong government effectiveness are more akin to an advanced developed country. Moody's believes that advanced economies with strong institutional foundations and deep capital markets can better manage relatively large levels of government debt and are generally less volatile in terms of economic performance and policy.
But Lindow stressed that Israel's policy track record itself tells a compelling story about the country's ability to withstand shocks and its payment capacity. Aside from a large government debt, explicit credit challenges include a low labor force participation rate and persistently high inflation.
"Until a little more than a decade ago, indexation sustained stubbornly high inflation that substantially raised the servicing costs of the government's large domestic debt," said Lindow. "A successful disinflation program, reinforced by a robust monetary policy framework and, more recently, fiscal orthodoxy has significantly reduced the debt and debt servicing burdens. Other structural reforms have brought down unemployment while raising labor participation."
Fiscal discipline has been sustained in the face of economic and political pressures, said Lindow, including heightened military spending during and after the Second Lebanon War in 2006. She said that this track record underscores Israel's strong commitment to lowering the large public debt.
In contrast to the large, expensive domestic debt, Moody's said that Israel's external debt and debt service is very manageable. About 70% of the government's external debt is sourced from US loan guarantees or State of Israel Bonds at favorable costs of funding. State of Israel Bonds are sold mainly to Jewish communities outside of Israel, a group with deep and ready pockets to finance the Jewish state, especially during times of domestic or regional conflict. "These ample sources of liquidity are key credit strengths underlying Israel's high credit rating," said Lindow.
Lindow pointed to Israel's precarious security environment and the very poor outlook for the resumption of a peace process with the Palestinians as another critical credit challenge.
"Ongoing regional and domestic conflict continues to complicate policymaking, contributes to outsized budgetary defense expenditures and also is an obstacle to increased investment and stronger growth," cautioned Moody's. "These factors are likely to constrain Israel's rating from reaching substantially higher rating levels."
Lindow said that in spite of the substantial economic costs extracted by the political conflicts, Israel's high-tech sector is boosting GDP growth and government revenues. Though below potential, Israel's economic growth has been steady and quite strong.
"Although Israel is not a commodity-producing country, it has posted consistent current account surpluses in recent years, and the country is already a large net external creditor," said Lindow. "These are key ingredients that help to insulate Israel's external sector from adverse global financial conditions."
Details from Fitchratings.com here
Standard & Poor's, the international credit rating agency raised its credit ratings for most Israeli foreign and domestic debt for the first time since 1995, on the back of four years of "robust'' economic growth and a shrinking state budget deficit.
"We expected this, but the timing was a bit of a surprise because we thought it would come after the 2008 budget vote at the end of December," said Michael Sarel, chief of economics at Harel Insurance & Finance Ltd. "It appears that the fiscal situation is so good that even if there are last-minute changes in the budget it won't make any difference."
Israel's long-term foreign currency rating was raised to A from A- and its long-term local-currency rating to AA- from A+. Israel's short-term domestic rating was boosted to A-1+ from A-1.
The upgrade was the first for Israel since 1995, when it was raised to A- from BBB+ as the government issued bonds for the first time ever overseas. Last February, S&P raised the outlook for Israel to "positive'' from "stable.'' S&P estimated for Israeli gross domestic product to grow 5.4 percent this year because of "strong'' exports and "dynamic'' consumer spending.
"Such a quick rebound after the conflict in Lebanon in August 2006 demonstrates the economy's ability to withstand severe shocks," said S&P credit analyst Veronique Paillat-Chayrigues.
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said that the upgrade was an "expression of confidence'' in the Israeli economy and the government's economic policy. Israel's economy has been growing since the middle of 2003, except for a retreat in third-quarter of 2006 during the Second War in the Lebanon. S&P forecasted that Israel's economy will probably grow a "relatively healthy'' 3.5% to 4% next year because the country's technology industry should be able to weather the impact of a slowdown in global trade. Furthermore, the government's budget deficit will probably narrow to 0.6% of GDP this year, compared with a budgeted 2.9%. Government debt will equal 82% of GDP by the end of this year, down from 103% in 2003.
(Communicated by the Prime Minister's Media Adviser)
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Ministerial Council Meeting in Paris on April 16, 2007, and approved a decision to open accession discussions with Israel.
This decision is the fruit of a complicated and comprehensive working process that was carried out over several years by the Prime Minister's Office, the Bank of Israel and the Finance, Foreign, Justice and Industry, Trade and Employment ministries. The decision attests to respect for the Israeli economy and constitutes international recognition of the State of Israel's achievements as a democratic and developing country, and of its ability to contribute both to the global economy and to the organization. The decision to invite Israel to begin the process of joining the OECD is an important diplomatic achievement.
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who accelerated the aforesaid process during his tenure as Industry, Trade and Employment Minister, praised the decision: "This is a step that expresses confidence in the Israeli economy, in its strength and in its ability to develop. The great jump that the Israeli economy has made in recent years will receive significant encouragement. There is no doubt that the country will be able to enjoy additional investments from all over the world. My Government, which has set as a goal the improvement of residents' quality of life and the reduction of gaps through increased growth, can now be proud that the process of entering the OECD has begun and that we are on the road to additional growth. I will see to it that all relevant Government ministries and bodies will make every effort so that the timetable for entering the OECD is as short as possible."
The membership process is expected to take one to one-and-a-half years. It will be necessary to pass legislation, enact reforms and meet the organization's standards. After the membership process is completed, Israel will be able to benefit from assistance in encouraging investments, the upgrading of the economy's credit rating, improvements in competitiveness, etc.
See the Finance Ministry International Affairs Department’s website at www.oecd.gov.il
Moody's Investors Service says in its annual report on Israel that the country’s investment-grade ratings and positive outlook reflect the country's improved economic dynamism and unusual resilience despite war and ongoing regional tensions. Moody’s rates Israel's foreign currency country ceiling for bonds as Aa1, based on the foreign currency government bond rating of A2, and its assessment of a very low risk of a payments moratorium in the event of a government bond default.
Moody's Vice President Kristin Lindow said, "The Israeli economy is in the midst of a prolonged upturn that was only briefly affected by last year's war with Hizbullah, the militant Islamic movement based in Lebanon. Growth has averaged 5% for the last three years, yet the current account surplus actually widened further each year and inflation was nonexistent in 2006."
Fitch Ratings improved Israel 's foreign and local currency Issuer Default ratings (IDR) to Positive from Stable. Richard Fox, Head of Middle East and Africa Sovereign Ratings at Fitch stated, "The Positive Outlook reflects the Israeli economy's increased dynamism and resilience following the reforms of recent years, demonstrated by the limited economic impact of the war in Lebanon and strong rebound now underway.
External solvency indicators have continued to improve and strong inward and outward investment reflect Israel’s growing integration with the world economy. "
(Source: IsraelNN.com)
The governor of the Bank of Israel, Stanley Fischer, stated today at a debate of the Knesset Finance Committee that the economic situation during the recent war in Lebanon was comparatively stable. Israelis had faith in the economy, and they did not transfer their investments abroad in any unusual manner. Foreign investors did not pull out in high numbers either as compared to investments before the war, stated the governor.
Fischer added that the stock exchange registered less of a rise or fall in comparison to stock markets around the world. The most negative result was the return on 10-year bonds, which rose by 0.2 percent, when the rest of the world registered a descent. The governor stated that this showed the risk premium that we have needed to pay.
Fischer stated that the conflict mostly affected industry, tourism, and services. He estimated that the loss in production was between 0.8-1 percent, and the war would have a long-time effect on foreign tourism.
By Ron Dermer
Smart investors see beyond the sound and fury of the moment and focus on fundamentals that pay huge dividends over time. As the Jewish state emerges from this latest round of violence, and as security is once again restored, Israel's economic motor will steam ahead. The smart money is getting on board now.
Before Hizbullah terrorists brazenly crossed an internationally recognized border, killed several Israeli soldiers, kidnapped two others, and fired a flurry of missiles into northern Israel, the Israeli economy was steaming ahead. In the first half of the year, it was enjoying 6% growth, low inflation, falling unemployment, a budget surplus, a balance of payments surplus, a shrinking national debt, and record levels of foreign investment - an economic picture that was accurately described by one international analyst as "nearly perfect."
Though five weeks of war struck a blow to Israel's economy, it is strong enough to absorb it. Indeed, Israel's economy remains strong, and it will only get stronger in the future.
Recognizing this, none of the major ratings agencies lowered Israel's credit rating during the war. Those who have been paying attention to the recent transformation of the Israeli economy understand why.
First, Israel's fiscal policies are sound. Three years ago, finance minister Binyamin Netanyahu put Israel's fiscal house in order, and his successors have maintained that order. Faced with a deep recession, a bloated public sector (55% of GDP), exploding deficits (6% of GDP), a high debt burden (106% of GDP) and sky-high tax rates (64% marginal rate), the government drastically cut the budget and sharply reduced taxes. Moreover, abiding by conditions set forth in a 9 billion dollar loan guarantee program with America, Israel capped spending growth at 1% per year, and has maintained that budgetary framework for the last three years.
The results have been dramatic. While still high, the public sector now accounts for less than one-half of GDP, tax revenues have skyrocketed, and debt ratios have dropped to under 90% of GDP, bringing them close to the ratios maintained by the leading industrialized nations.
Second, a number of important structural reforms were implemented in the last three years. The government sold off its stake in the country's second and third largest banks, and privatized a number of state-owned companies including EL AL, the national airline, and Bezek, the national phone company. In addition, Israel overhauled the government pension system, restructured the ports, modernized the country's rail and road systems, and, perhaps most important, reformed the country's capital market, forcing what was effectively a banking duopoly to sell off its exclusive control of most of the country's financial assets.
The new government, led by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, and Finance Minister Avraham Hirschson, has said that it is committed to continuing these prudent fiscal policies and to pressing forward with reform. Just three weeks ago, in the middle of the war, the government sold one of Israel's two oil refineries for $800 million, a sum nearly triple what it had been expected to fetch.
Sound fiscal policy is buttressed by sound monetary policy. Now that Alan Greenspan has retired, Israel can justifiably boast of having the finest central banker in the world in Stanley Fisher. With investors confident in his steady hand navigating Israel's economic ship, both the Israeli stock market and the shekel have essentially maintained their pre-war values.
But beyond the personalities or the policies of its government lies the real key to Israel's future - its people. With more scientists, engineers, high-tech start ups, and research & development spending per capita than any country in the world, Israel will continue to provide investors with access to human capital that is second to none.
That is why companies like Hewlett Packard and Sandisk acquired Israeli firms and technology in billion dollar deals after the war had already started, and why Greylock Partners just launched a $150 million venture capital fund to invest in early stage Israeli technology. That is also why it was no surprise when Intel announced last month that its Israeli R&D facility in Haifa developed a new chip that will form the core of the company's new mobile and desktop production line, and why Warren Buffet said that the war would not have dissuaded him from his recent purchase of a four billion dollar stake in Iscar, an international metal works company based in northern Israel.
To be sure, in addition to the scores who have lost their lives and the hundreds who have been injured, the war has caused significant economic damage. With missiles raining down on Israel's northern cities, the thousands of companies located there were either closed or forced to operate at only a fraction of their capacity. Tourism in the country as a whole, and in the north in particular has been hit hard, and will surely take many months to recover.
But tourism represents less than 2% of Israel's GDP. The heart of Israel's economy remains the export of high-technology goods and services and its pulse remains the highly skilled, dynamic, and entrepreneurial workforce that creates those goods and services.
On July 25, Standard & Poors affirmed Israels long-term foreign and local currency credit ratings at A- and A+ respectively, and its short-term foreign and local currency ratings at 'A-1'. The company also maintained Israels stable outlook, stating, The ratings reflect the improved resilience of Israels public finances and economy to geopolitical shocks, after a three-year period of fiscal consolidation and strong economic growth.
A news announcement released by Fitch on July 14 noted, Although confidence in Israel will take a short-term knock from the recent escalation of violence, the economy starts from a buoyant position which, together with a robust policy framework, will help limit economic fallout. Fitch is maintaining its foreign and local currency ratings at A- and A with a stable outlook.
As emerging markets experience their steepest slide in eight years, investment bank Deutsche Bank this week singled out Israel as one of two "safe havens" for investors looking to put their money in developing countries' exchanges.
"For those with very strong risk aversion, the low beta markets with little commodity exposure are Israel and Malaysia. They are your safe haven," Kingsmill Bond, emerging markets strategist at Deutsche Bank said in a research report.
Bond told The Jerusalem Post it was an accepted fact that Israel was a low volatility market compared to other emerging markets due to it not being subject to currency, commodity or interest rate spread concerns.
"Essentially Israel has a much more developed market type of environment," he said.
Emerging markets have lost 14 percent since their peak two weeks ago with Turkey, Argentina, South Africa and Russia listed by Bond as the worst performers for the period.
The Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets Index, which tracks shares in 26 developing countries globally, rose 2.3% to 767.15 during afternoon trade in London on Tuesday, on track to break the longest losing streak the index has had in eight years. The measure had experienced 10 straight days of losses.
The sell-off in emerging markets, according to Bond, came as a result of higher than expected US inflation data combined with slightly weaker US growth numbers.
"Investors are concerned that the Fed will be obliged to tighten by more and that in turn this will damage US growth," he said. "Weaker US growth will lead to weaker commodity prices and rising spreads between emerging market bonds and US treasuries, which are the two key drivers of emerging markets."
The TA-25 index meanwhile, having edged the 900 benchmark level on May 8, has since dropped to 870 at close of trade Tuesday, slightly above the level it was at the beginning of the month.
While Bond has a rating of "underweight" for Israel, he listed it among the countries in which buying opportunities are likely to materialize, and which do not have major macroeconomic vulnerabilities. He added that the investment house was reconsidering the rating "as long as internal economic growth continued."
Earlier this week, the Finance Ministry raised its growth forecasts for the year from 4.1% to 5.3%.
"Israeli society and its political and economic decision-makers have shown remarkable resiliency."
May 10, 2006
Moody's Investors Service has changed the outlook on Israel's key foreign-currency ratings from "Stable" to "Positive". "Israeli society and its political and economic decision-makers have shown remarkable resiliency in meeting the numerous challenges of the last few years," the announcement from Moody's said. The outlook change to positive affects Israel's foreign-currency ceiling, its foreign-currency government bonds (not guaranteed by the U.S. government), its foreign-currency bank deposit ceiling, and its local-currency bonds (all currently rated A2). Israel's local-currency bank deposit ceiling (Aa2) and its local currency guideline (Aa1) have a stable outlook and were not affected by today's rating action. The local currency guideline is the highest possible rating that could be assigned to obligors and obligations denominated in local currency within a country.
"Israel is exhibiting considerable growth of GDP per capita (purchasing power parity basis), moving towards a level more often associated with advanced economies than with developing ones. Also, the government debt-to-GDP and debt-to-revenue ratios have been on a declining trend since 2004," Moody's said.
"Israeli institutions have proved to be extremely robust in the face of considerable external and internal shocks, including global recession, the incapacitation of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, the reformulation of the political spectrum, and repeated terrorist threats and actions.
" When combined with the unusual sources of financial assistance afforded by various programs of the United States government and Israelis and Jews living outside Israel, the result over time may imply a diminution of credit risk.".
Moody's said it would monitor the new government's ability to continue to reduce the important government debt-to-GDP and debt-to-revenue ratios. The rating agency will also monitor the negative impact of geopolitical risk factors on the country's creditworthiness.